© - Steven A. Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.
“A typical arrangement by Supersax begins with the theme, followed by a reproduction of Parker's solo; both of these are accompanied by block harmonies, and the melody is doubled at the lower octave by the baritone saxophonist. After solos by one or more players the piece ends with a further block harmonization of the theme.”
-Thomas Owens, The New Grove Dictionary of Jazz, [p. 1172]
“… the harmonizations of Parker’s work are ingenious and effective.”
- Leonard Feather/Ira Gitler , The Biographical Encyclopedia of Jazz, [p. 630]
“Playing on the Supersax arrangements is like trying to change your car’s fan belt while the engine is running.”
- A last-minute substitute recounting his experience to Gene Lees as quoted in Grover Sales, author of Jazz: America’s Classical Music [p. 147]
One of the most enthralling musical experiences of my life – then and now - has been listening to Jazz while being in the presence of Supersax
I say “then and now” because fortunately for me, I’ve been listening to various iterations of the group - which is made up of two alto saxophones, two tenors, a baritone, and either a trumpet or trombone soloist and a 3-piece rhythm section - from its first public performance as a unit in 1972 at Donte’s, a former Jazz club in North Hollywood, CA, to a later version of the group still headed-up by Med Flory that appeared at the LA Jazz Institute’s Groovin’ High: A Celebration of the Bebop Era, 2001.
The original solos by the late, alto saxophonist Charlie Parker’s are incredible both in conception and in execution, but the idea of reproducing these using five-part harmony as played by a standard sax section comprised of two alto saxes, two tenor and a baritone is sheer genius.
Beyond the idea there is the “getting there” part which must have been sheer torture, especially since much of Jazz phrasing escapes the dictums of written notation.
Put another way, it’s one thing to listen to Bird’s solos, it’s quite another thing to write them down, read them and play them in five-part harmony.
As described in the following materials abstracted from interviews with Med Flory, the alto saxophonist who is one of the group’s co-founders along with bassist Buddy Clark, insert notes by the distinguished Jazz critic, Leonard Feather and two articles excerpted from Downbeat magazine, the process of transcribing Bird’s work into written arrangements was an arduous, yet rewarding, labor of love.
It would seem that there were various starting and stopping points in the evolution of Supersax before it made it’s first public appearance in 1972, but when you hear the group perform, it was all worth waiting for.
Some hold the opinion that Supersax is a gimmick; I think it’s one of the greatest achievements in the history of Jazz, not only because it further memorializes one of the founders of modern Jazz – Charlie Parker – but also because it continues the Jazz traditions of reinvention, adaptation and assimilating aspects of the music into different contexts.
The group’s first recording was Supersax Plays Bird which was recorded in 1972/73 and won a Grammy Award for best performance by a Jazz ensemble in 1974. Not a bad way to start things off.
In his insert notes to this recording, Leonard Feather places Supersax in context, explains it significance and describes what’s going on in the music on the first recording.
“It is a rare occurrence in contemporary music when a new group is organized whose premise, while uniquely fresh and exciting in execution, is based on a concept deeply rooted in the best traditions of the past. Supersax is just such an instance.
The premise is simple. Charlie Parker's solos, exactly as improvised while being committed to records, were of such inspired and awesome originality that they constituted de facto compositions in their own right.
In other words, when Bird blew a series of choruses based on the chord pattern of some standard song, the product was a work of art worthy of being extracted from its original context and expanded through the medium of orchestration.
There have been occasional isolated cases in which ad lib solos were developed in this manner. Two of the earliest were the Bix Beiderbecke solo on Singin' The Blues and Bunny Berigan's contribution to the Tommy Dorsey version of Marie, both of which were transcribed off the records and voiced for trumpet sections. Vocally, of course, the idea was picked up by a long line of singers, from Eddie Jefferson to King Pleasure to Lambert, Hendricks & Ross.
The unprecedented use of this precept as the basis for an entire instrumental library grew out of Med Flory's association with the late Joe Maini, a widely respected alto player who died in 1964. ‘Joe was working in a big band I had around Los Angeles
‘I said, “Fine, but who's going to write it?’” Buddy said, 'Let me try it — just show me what to do.' I gave him a few hints on which way to go, and he started writing. I was busy at the time on a movie script, so I was too hung up to do many of the arrangements myself." (Flory has long led a triple life as TV actor, professional script writer and studio musician.)
A band coalesced to meet the formidable challenge of reading and sensitively interpreting these uncommonly demanding arrangements. After one or two changes the personnel heard on this album was arrived at, with Flory and Joe Lopes on alto saxes, Warne Marsh and Jay Migliori on tenors, Jack Nimitz on baritone, Conti Candoli on trumpet, Ronnell Bright on piano, Jake Hanna on drums and Clark on bass. On Just Friends, Repetition and Moose the Mooche, a seven-man brass section was added.
The common bond among these men that canceled out the diversity of their backgrounds was an intense love for and understanding of the contribution of Charlie Parker. Two of them actually worked with Bird briefly, Ronnell Bright in Chicago Boston 52nd Street
When after 11 months of patient wood-shedding [practicing], Supersax finally was presented to the public at Donte's, a question came to the minds of some listeners: does this concept constitute living in the past, or is it rather a case of relevance-through-renovation?
My own feeling immediately was that a new dimension had been added to these time-defying solo lines, as though a Picasso painting had become a sculpture, or an Old Master restored. In fact, just to hear, sectionalized and harmonized, the incredibly fast choruses based on the phenomenal Ko-Ko solo, is an experience such as Bird himself surely would have dug.
This, in effect, is how Charlie Parker would have sounded had he been able to play five saxophones at once, in harmony.
Med Flory wrote the arrangements for Be-Bop, Star Eyes, Moose the Mooche, and Just Friends; the other charts were all written by Buddy Clark. As Clark points out, "Most of the way we had the baritone sax double the melody line. That was the simple, logical way to do it. Everything moves so fast in a Bird solo that if you start breaking it up, it becomes kind of logy."
"Besides," added Med, "the lines themselves are as important and timeless as Mozart, so we didn't dare do anything that would tend to understate them." [Emphasis, mine]
The reed team is balanced so that Med's lead alto is the strongest voice, the baritone is next, and the three harmony parts are just about equal. Occasionally, on the more sustained passages, the voices were changed to add a little sonority (one instance is the second chorus of Star Eyes), but the group's basic sound is that of the two parallel melody lines an octave apart.
Since Charlie Parker made many of his definitive recordings before the age of the long play record, and because he usually accorded part of the limited solo space to his sidemen, in many cases there was not enough improvisational bird, on any one record of each tune, to constitute a full length Supersax arrangement. Buddy and Med resolved this in several tunes by using a composite of solos from two different versions of the same number. Hot House, says Buddy, is ‘a combination of all kinds of Bird riffs from various records he made on these changes, either as Hot House or as What Is This Thing Called Love.’
Ko-Ko, possibly the greatest Bird masterpiece of all, is based on the original 1945 recording, just as Parker's Mood derives from the master take cut in 1948. Similarly drawn from a single source is Just Friends, from the chart that became the most celebrated of the precedent-setting Parker-With-Strings date taped Nov. 30, 1949 .
Even Mitch Miller's brief oboe solo following the first chorus was retained in this faithful translation by Med of the Jimmy Carroll arrangement. Oh, Lady Be Good! was taken in its entirety from a Jazz at the Philharmonic concert record cut in Los Angeles
Regardless of the sources of their inspiration, most important of all is that steeped as they were in the subject, the Supersax musicians succeeded in retaining the spirit as well as the letter of Bird's one-to-a-century genius.
‘Just say,' Med Flory enjoined me as we discussed my notes for the album, ‘that this was our affectionate tribute to a man we've respected and idolized through the years.’
The comment was almost redundant, for on every track in this extraordinary set of performances you will hear the overtones of a project conceived and written with patience and dedication, executed with honesty and warmth. Supersax Plays Bird, as much as any album I have heard in recent years, is a thoroughgoing labor of love.”
In an interview Med Flory [MF] gave to Marc Myers for his Jazzwax blog [JW], he described the origins of Supersax as dating all the way back to 1948!
“JW: How did you come up with the idea for Supersax?
MF: What inspired me initially was Ralph Burns’ 1948 arrangement of the chorus to I’ve Got News for You. That was for Woody Herman’s [pictured] band. It was a Shorty Roger s chart but Ralph wrote the chorus. It was a reworking of Dark Shadows, the song Charlie Parker had recorded a year earlier with Earl Coleman. Ralph had written out Parker's solo for the five saxes.
JW: When did the idea to transcribe Parker's solos first hit you?
MF: Around October 1956. [Saxophonists] Joe Maini, Charlie Kennedy, Richie Kamuca and Bill Hood came by my house.
Joe Maini had a record player and a bunch of Parker records. I gave him $50 for the player and the discs. Then I started transcribing a few things of Bird’s that were in the stack, like Star Eyes, Chasin’ the Bird and Just Friends. I wrote out those three charts from the records. Then later we played them down. We were just screwing around. One night in 1957 we were playing the Crescendo [a club on the Sunset Strip in Hollywood , CA Dave PellClark was playing bass.
Afterward, we all went over to my pad. Buddy said, “Play that thing with the saxes—Just Friends.” When we were done, Dave said, “Boy wouldn’t it be great to have a whole book of those things.” Buddy said he’d take a shot. The trick was to keep everything within an octave. The line is everything. What Bird played is the thing. You don’t have to dress it up with voicings or anything.
JW: Were they hard to play?
MF: Bet your ass. You have a line that has to flow. All of the parts have to flow like the line. You can’t have trick things like jump lines. You have to find a way to keep everyone flowing tight and the right way. You have a bunch of choices to make on each chord. It’s like doing the New York Times crossword puzzle—except when you’re done you have something more than yesterday’s newspaper. You also want to keep what’s known in the music business as “a rub”—a half step in every chord. So, you want a B up against a C. It busts up the chord and keeps the line from becoming complacent. You have to have the rub between the second alto and first tenor or two tenors. Not the two altos.
JW: In the early 1970s, you and Buddy finally had the time to take the concept to the next level.
MF: Yeah. At first it was me and Perk [Bill Perkins] on alto saxophone, Pete Christlieb on tenor and Bill Hood on baritone. We started rehearsing. Hood left because he was entering his old folks stage and didn’t want to get involved in work. Christlieb burned a hole in his eardrum working on cars with high-pitched tools. So we got Joe Lopes on alto, Jay Migliori and Warne Marsh on tenors, and Jack Nimitz on baritone. We rehearsed for about a year at my place and at Buddy’s house. Joanie, my wife, got tired of us rehearsing all the time and called up the guy who owned Donte’s and pushed him to book us.
JW: What happened?
MF: We went into Donte's on a Monday night. We played Parker’s Mood, and after the first chorus, everyone in the place jumped up and went nuts. Mauri Lathower from Capitol Records happened to be there and was in heaven. He signed us right away for three albums.
JW: What did you learn about Charlie Parker during this experience?
MF: Bird knew what he was doing. You can’t memorize that stuff and play it. Just when you think he’s going one way, he goes another. He was all about surprise. Not big ones. Little ones. Like the rub. I’d always try to play like him and never could. When you listen to him, you gotta know he’s from somewhere else.
JW: Did you listen to Parker as a kid?
MF: First time I heard him I was a senior in high school. I didn’t know it was him. I just heard some guy playing The Jumpin’ Blues with Jay McShann’s band. Then when I was in the army, I heard Bird’s first records as a leader. I said, “He’s OK but he’s not as good as that guy in McShann’s band” [laughs].”
A couple of years after Supersax’s first public appearance at Donte’s, Downbeat featured them on the cover of its November 21, 1974 edition which also contained this article by Ray Townley and Tim Hogan.
Supersax: The Genius of Bird X Five
© - Downbeat Magazine/Ray Townley/Tim Hogan, copyright protected; all rights reserved.
"Here he was. articulating imperious messages over the saxophone. Listening required real concentration Nothing glib came out of the horn. Every solo was played with high seriousness. The saxophone cried of love, rage, and black power. The elements heard in black music since the first rural bluesman had drifted to the urban ghettos had been contained and contemporized. There was nothing of Louis Armstrong's archaic minstrelsy or Lester's bittersweet romanticism. This was the real grit that Bird put down. An evening with Charlie Parker was not an entertainment. Listening to Charlie demanding, moving, often chilling experience— like an evening with Lenny Bruce [satirical comedian]."
—Ross Russell, Bird Lives [Charterhouse]
"When I recorded with strings, some of my friends said. 'Oh. Bird is getting commercial. That wasn't it at all. I was looking for new ways of saying things musically. New sound combinations.
"Why. I asked for strings as far back as 1941 and then, years later, when I went with Norman
—Charlie (Bird) Parker. down beat (1/28/53 )
"Charlie Parker is one of the few jazzmcn who can be said to have given dignity and meaning to the abused word ‘genius.’ It was his desire to devote his life to the translation of everything he saw and heard into terms of musical beauty. Though it was his inspiration, his soul and warmth that earned him an international reputation, and although he had little formal training, he was a man of amazing technical skill, a fast reader and a gifted compose-arranger. His best records were those he made with a small, informal combo, but he was proudest of the series of albums he made, starting in 1950, with a group featuring strings and woodwinds. (The first modern jazz soloist to record in this context, he led the way for dozens of others whose 'With Strings' albums followed his.)"
—Leonard Feather, The Encyclopedia of Jazz
“If you ever tune in the TV and see a saxophone-wielding cowboy race out of a Dodge City
Flory has appeared in over 150 rnajor TV shows, most recently in the second Gunsmoke serial of the season where he played a lily-livered sheriff. The night before Thanksgiving he'll appear in a GE Theatre film with Patricia Neil called Things in Their Season, and he's got a shot in Police Woman coming up later in the year. At first glance, even at second or third, it's hard to believe that this Clint Eastwood-built and very Hollywood-ish styled man would have anything to do with the legend and legacy of the modern savior of Afro- American music, Charlie Bird Parker.
But Med Flory is currently involved in one of the most exciting Charlie Parker projects to date — transcribing Bird's famed alto solos note for note and then arranging them in harmony for a five-piece reed section.
Bassist Buddy Clark, Flory’s partner in his ingenious and eulogistic endeavor, strikes the opposite pose from that of the Flory nature boy: scholastic, demure, more the modern classicist than the modern be-hopper. But Clark is one of the busiest bassists on the hectic LA club and studio scenes. He plays the Merv Griffith Show, does frequent subbing for Ray Brown around town and just completed three weeks on the road with Steve Lawrence and Eydie Gorme. He also owns one of the finest collection of Bird choruses anywhere.
***
The underlying concept behind Supersax was aptly described by Leonard Feather: “The premise is simple. Charlie Parker's solos exactly as improvised while being committed to records, were of such inspired and awesome originality that they constituted de facto compositions in their own right. In other words, when Bird blew
A series of choruses based on the chord pattern of some standard song, the product was a work of art worthy of being extracted from its context and expanded through the medium of orchestration."
The birth of Supersax stretches back to 1962 when Med Flory was playing in a big band with Joe Maini and Buddy Clark. Flory was irked that the brass section of the band was getting almost all of the solo spotlight so he wrote out a trio of Parker choruses to give the sax section some prominence. Maini, on alto, led the section with his unique percussive attack, which helped make the Bird interpretations come off extremely heartfelt. But Maini’s untimely death caused the band to break up and the idea of doing a whole book of orchestrated Parker solos was scrapped until a decade later when bassist Clark was hanging out in Flory’s home.
As Clark and Flory listened to old tapes of Blues for Alice Clark , but was involved with writing a film script and couldn't take the time to transcribe the charts necessary for such a project Clark had time available so after a few quick lessons from Flory, he was cranking out a chart a week.
After eleven months of rehearsal, the band included Jay Migliori (tenor). Joe Lopes (alto), Clark (bass), Flory (alto), Warne Marsh (tenor), Jack Nimitz (baritone), Conte Candoli (trumpet), Carl Fontana (trombone), Jake Hanna (drums), and Lou Levy (piano).
Flory’s wife, knowing how good the band was, called Donte's, a prominent Los Angeles
The following Sunday, in November of '72. they went into Donte's for their club debut and have been blowing hard and fast ever since. Their first album Supersax Plays Bird (Capitol 11177) was released in May of ’73 and picked up a Grammy Award in the 1974 polls as the Best Jazz Performance by a Group. Their second LP
(Salt Peanuts, Capitol 11271) was released in March '74, continuing their high-spirited tribute to the sax genius. Recently, they returned to the studio to do number three, again a collection of Bird material only this time with string accompaniment. Trombonist Frank Rosolino has replaced Carl Fontana and drummer Harold Jones has replaced Jake Hanna.
Hogan: What exactly is it that you do to a Parker tune?
Flory: Buddy’s got just about every Parker chorus he can get a hold of And we look for the best one.
Flory: Recording techniques are such today that you're going to get better response out of the horn. A lot of times Bird recorded under conditions that were not too groovy So a lot of times in order to get the line he was playing you have to re-construct what he was thinking. If you listen to some old Bird records, a lot of times a bomb that Max [Roach, drummer] would drop covered up a few of the notes. When you have five guys playing those notes that you reconstruct almost like archeology or something, [you figure] there had to be a few things he could do. What lays best on the horn is probably the way he went, which gives a saxophonist-composer an advantage over anybody else because he's got his horn to refer to.
A lot of those things in Bird Lives, for example, on Lester Leaps In. there's a guy over there yelling. "Hoy” every fifth beat. He's cutting right into the line so you've gotta take your best shot and harmonize it the best way you can hoping you're doing it justice.
Flory: Sometimes he'd just jaywalk across the chord. Like the chord would be going one way and he'd play something that was "out there," that there's no way you can make it fit that chord So you have to make up your mind which way you're gonna go—whether you're voice everything that he's doing, in terms of the chord that's really there, or go with him and meet him over there some place. Usually that's the best way to go.
You've got alto. alto, tenor, tenor and the bari
But you can't do that because you can hear it every time. If a guy plays the same note twice, going over the bar line while everybody else is moving, BANG, you're gonna hear it right there in the middle.
So you have to figure out ways for their lines to move diatonically in the same way as the lead line. And that takes a lot of work. It's like a game of chess, figuring out the next move. You have to think ahead three or four moves. In this, you've gotta think seven or eight notes ahead in order to figure out where you're gonna come out in order to keep that line going.
It it's a long run and gonna keep going, you gotta figure out where you're gonna break, so there'll be the minimum break in there. It's really wild. And for that reason, this sax section doesn't sound like any other sax section around. We try to keep a half-step in the chord at all times If you keep writing without a half-step in there, you're gonna build up overtones. You're gonna get that traditional tubby sound in the sax section. And that's, awful.
I've played in sax sections all my life, and when you play a note you know what chord it is and you know how it's gonna sound because everybody does it the same way. It's like those Mickey Mouse chords and it's a drag Not just the chord but the way it sounds
But if you've got those half-steps in there, you're breaking up the overtones. Then your top tines will come out strong. You've got a real sizzler without breaking your head to do it. or getting a mouthpiece with a gearshift on it.
Hogan: How loyal do you stay to the original Parker chart?
I tried to broaden out a little bit after I got my feel wet and I brought in some stuff where I'd open the chords up wider than they had been. It just didn't come of. But sometimes for special effect I'd do it, like there're a couple of places on Ko-Ko where it's spiced up a little. It's kind of effective but it's strange, spooky kind of chord. It isn’t really a flat-out big band chord. It's a chord based on intervals rather than a triad.
Townley: How did uou manage to get the five members of the reed section to stay rhythmically in tempo with one another? Some of the choruses arc taken at lightning pace.
Flory: It was murder in the beginning It really was murder I knew what I wanted it to sound like, more or less, because I always dug Bird But it's hard when you get good saxophonists. Everybody's got his own idea about how k ought to go.
I like a real percussive style of lead, daylight in between the notes wherever possible, so it’s not just a steady flow of sound and tongued notes. There are so many different ways of attacking notes — with your tongue on the reed, popping, and sliding. To get all those things to work out. we just had to keep playing together for a long, long time. Now, when we bring up a new chart, the writing is a little more adaptable to what we're doing Now the performance the first time through is better than it used to be after a whole rehearsal or an entire week.
Everybody had to learn to sublimate what he wanted to do personally, including myself.
Townley: You were just speaking about daylight between the notes rather than just one continuous sound. Is that what makes your section different from most of the other reed sections in existence? Most other sections are modeled on the pre-Bird vibrato sound ol Johnny Hodges.
Flory: Well, take the reed sections before Parker, like the ones in Lunceford's band and Duke's They would spread out the voicings and go for that big sound with the baritone down on the bottom, then one of the tenors a fifth above that, and so forth. That gives you more of a full sound rather than a real jazz sound.
The line is so important in what Bird does that you have to concentrate on that line. That's why I started by doubling the baritones and the altos. I got a sound in which you're never going the line he played.
I never was much ot a Johnny Hodges fan myself. I liked Benny Carter rather than Hodges. But once I heard Bird I knew that was the way it was suppose to be, and you can't sound like Bird playing like Johnny Hodges or Marshall Royal or any of those guys. They come from an entirely different school. It would he a mixed bag, you know, what with that kind of carrier sound they get where they float the sound and get that vibrato. And the vibrato stays pretty much the same.
It's different with Bird. Sometimes he played with no vibrato at all for a few notes and then he'd play with a nice warm vibrato. It depended on the phrase he was doing and where he got it from because he thought in phrases from all over the place. He might quote from the opera, from some Kansas City
Hogan: What’s the most difficult part of doing Parker materials?
Flory: Playing it [laughter].
Y'know what’s weird is that the audience flips out more when we play ballads then when we play something that's absolutely impossible to play.
Flory: Over half the people who come out to see us play are chicks. You can't just play “out” music and get it going. Parker played pretty. He played jazz that was hard and everything like that, but it had romance in it.
Whereas, you go beyond that, like Trane, it ain't the most romantic music in the world. It's very esoteric and it doesn't cover as much ground as Bird does. A woman can sit and listen to Bird and dig it from a romantic point of view.
You can play Star Eyes or My Old Flame or Embraceable You or Lover Man, and even though it's not the melody that they're used to hearing, they can dig it. And the kids are starting to dig it because kids today are hip. They’ve got a better time feel than kids when I was young.
Townley: How come Supersax sounds so much smoother than Parker ever did, even though youre playing the same notes?
Flory: Naturally it’s gotta sound a lot different because what we are doing is pointing up the harmonics that Bud was thinking or the harmonies you hope he was thinking. You're putting a structure along with that line, so you're essentially filling in a lot of the gaps. It’s almost like going to school on him. Essentially, you're giving a harmony to the melody lines he played. So it’s a different thing.
Townley: Is Supersax a group that seeks to entertain its audience? It seems Bird wasn't really interested in doing that.
Flory: Well listening to Bud was not like listening someone like listening to Earl Bostic or someone like that who played for the effect it would have on the audience, you dig. Or Louie Jordan would he a better example. A great, groovy jazz player, he played to get people stomping.
Or Hamp — Hamp's hand, when he played he knew what he could do to those people to get them jumping up and down. He wanted to entertain them. But Bird, he was so inside, so esoteric. I'm sure he didn't give a rat's ass what the people thought of what he was doing. He was just playing and you had to get with him instead of him putting you in a certain frame of mind.
Townley: What about Supersax?
Flory: Oh. it's kind of a — there's a lot of jive going on in the band and everybody is having fun playing, you know. Certainly there's an element entertainment. I like to keep things lose up there between tunes so that it doesn't fall into a classroom thing. I think that's what helped kill jazz so horribly after World War II anyway, guys turning their backs on the audience and guys sometimes spending a whole set figuring out what they were going to play next. It was really a drag.”
© - Downbeat Magazine/Harvey Siders, copyright protected; all rights reserved.
The always candid and insightful Harvey Siders was in attendance the night Supersax premiered at Donte’s and he published this review of the event in Downbeat.
CAUGHT IN THE ACT: Super Sax Plays Bird
V. xl/No. 3, 1973.
Donte’s. North Hollywood , CA. Personnel: Med Flory, Bill Perkins, alto sax; Warne Marsh, Jay Migliori, tenor sax; Jack Nimitz, baritone sax; Ronnell Bright, piano; Buddy Clark, bass; Jake Hanna, drums.
It had to he one of Donte's most intriguing marquees: Supersax Plays Bird. I can't imagine the reaction of people driving by; they probably thought it was a new rock group. But the musicians in this studio-oriented community knew what was happening. The 11-month experiment by Med Flory and Buddy Clark was finally getting it’s first public exposure.
Shortly before Christmas 1971, Med Flory and Buddy Clark began transcribing Charlie Parker solos from their collection of records and tapes and arranging them for a sax section. At the same time, they began to form their nucleus of Bird watchers, weeding out those who could not make rehearsals or did not share their unilateral devotion to one musical deity.
What took shape was a dream sax section consisting of Flory. Perkins. Marsh. Migliori. and Nimitz. Conte Candoli's trumpet was added for variation in solo color With Clark and Hanna anchoring the rhythm section, only piano was a question mark On the night of the review. Ronnell Bright answered more than ably.
With the overflow crowd in an anticipatory mood. Clark kicked off a slow blues, Parker’s Mood. Not just slow, but tantalizing. And then it happened: Supersax entered, and with it. the fruition of all those rehearsals, all that transcribing, all that worrying and planning. Five Charlie Parkers suddenly came alive - not in timbre or style, but in spirit. Five saxes, tightly voiced, faithfully re-created the famous Bird with every nuance intact.
It’s difficult to tell whether everyone in Dome's aviary was a Bird fan. but it wasn't difficult to measure the response. What they heard was musically and historically gratifying, and it svumg' And without taking any jazz away from the excitement, it was a tour de force.
For the first improvised chorus, Conte offered an inventive, soulful solo. The Bright followed with a short, meaningful comment. The saxes took it out, and from the applause that followed, a mutual love affair had been initiated.
Number two was The Bird, with the same format: Sax soli, Candoli, then Bright. This time, an individual statement was made; Warne Marsh, with a characteristic tenor lag that made you (at least it made me) want to “goose him” to catch up.
As for the saxes, collectively, the blend was better because the voicings lay in a higher register than in Parker’s Mood. The tricky figures of the old Parker riff were executed flawlessly – all harmony, no unison – and the spectre of Bird loomed larger than life. Somehow it transcended the five “sax Friends” bursting their guts. What resulted was a new and greater (if possible) respect for the original architect who conceived these incredible lines and shapes.
A healthier respect for the super saxophonists were gained on the ballad My Old Flame. There’s nothing like a slow tempo to separate the men from the boys in a section. Well, as we all knew from the outset, there were no weak links here. They not only phrased as one; they breathed as one.
They had little chance to breathe in the next one. Donna Lee, based on the changes of Indiana - a way-up swinger that offered some outstanding section work pushed by the high-powered percussiveness of Hanna.
The success of that chart led Flory (whose witty low-key introductions provided much needed relief to the intensity of the playing) to remark: “Let’s do the next one before the pill wears off.”
The next one was Ko-Ko, the impossible head built on Cherokee changes. How all five came through that ordeal unscathed will never be known. Yet all the intricacies were negotiated; all of the sudden twists and turns, soft shoulders and dangerous curves were mastered; not a beat was skipped.
Candoli and Bright contributed excellent solos, but the solo honors belonged to Migliori and Marsh for their long, exciting tenor dialogue. Ideas were not merely exchanged, they were imitated and elaborated upon. The end of one statement often became a launching pad for the next. Visually it was an equally remarkable duet: Migliori never opens his eyes when he solos; Marsh never closes his. But both had their ears wide open.
So did the audience. Their wild applause at the end of the treacherous out chorus was loud enough and long enough to thank not only the co-leaders who fashioned the sixteen charts in the book and those “saxidermists” who lavished time and talent on stuffing The Bird, but Parker himself, whose genius was seen in a new, diffused light.
Between sets, Flory confessed to me that the whole project was a “labor of insanity.” But I’m certain he didn’t really mean it. The reception was too rewarding. If he and Buddy Clark had resurrected the essence of Charlie Parker, Supersax represented the quint-essence.”
The following video features Supersax performing Parker's Mood. Conte Candoli takes the trumper solo.
I still shake my head in disbelief every time I hear Supersax perform. I got to witness a miracle in my lifetime, or, at least, to hear one.